|
CREATION OF GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK
The birth of present-day Grand Teton National Park involved
controversy and a struggle that lasted several decades. Animosity toward
expanding governmental control and a perceived loss of individual
freedoms fueled anti-park sentiments in Jackson Hole that nearly
derailed establishment of the park. By contrast, Yellowstone National
Park benefited from an expedient and near universal agreement for its
creation in 1872. The world’s first national park took only two years
from idea to reality; however Grand Teton National Park evolved through
a burdensome process requiring three separate governmental acts and a
series of compromises.
• The original Grand Teton National Park, set aside by an act of
Congress in 1929, included only the Teton Range and six glacial lakes at
the base of the mountains.
• The Jackson Hole National Monument, decreed by Franklin Delano
Roosevelt through presidential proclamation in 1943, combined Teton
National Forest acreage, other federal
properties including Jackson Lake and a generous 35,000-acre donation by
John D. Rockefeller, Jr. The Rockefeller lands continued to be privately
held until December 16, 1949
when impasse for addition to the national park was resolved.
• On September 14, 1950, the original 1929 Park and the 1943 National
Monument (including Rockefeller’s donation) were united into a “new”
Grand Teton National Park, creating
present-day boundaries.
As early as 1897, Colonel S.B.M. Young, acting Superintendent of
Yellowstone, proposed to expand Yellowstone’s boundaries southward to
encompass portions of northern Jackson Hole and protect
migrating elk herds. In 1898 Charles D. Walcott, head of the U.S.
Geological Survey, made a similar proposal, suggesting that the Teton
Range be included as well as northern Jackson Hole. Neither the
Interior Department nor Congress acted on either of these proposals. In
1916, a new bureau called the National Park Service was created within
the Department of Interior. This bureau could promote park
ideas both locally and at the national level with the creation of a
Washington DC office. Director of the National Park Service, Stephen
Mather and his assistant, Horace Albright affirmed their commitment
toward park expansion in a 1917 report to Secretary of the Interior,
Franklin Lane. The report stated that adding part of the Tetons, Jackson
Lake, and headwaters of the Snake River to Yellowstone National Park is
“one of seven urgent needs facing the Park Service." Mather and Albright
worked with the Wyoming congressional delegation to draft a bill
addressing expansion of Yellowstone’s boundaries into the Teton country.
Congressman Frank Mondell of Wyoming introduced the bill in 1918. The
House unanimously approved a revised bill in 1919. However, the bill
died in the Senate when Idaho Senator John Nugent feared the loss of
sheep grazing permits with expanded park service jurisdiction. As
historian Robert Righter states, “an opportunity had been lost. Never
again would park extension be so non-controversial.”
In
addition to Idaho sheep ranchers, other groups opposed park extension;
these included regional U.S. Forest Service personnel, Jackson Hole
businessmen, and some area ranchers. In 1919 Yellowstone
Superintendent, Horace Albright was unaware of the pervasive anti-park
attitude in Jackson Hole. As a result, he was practically “run out of
town” when he traveled to Jackson to promote his park enlargement
vision. Ranchers worried that park extension would reduce grazing
allotments; Forest Service employees feared the loss of jurisdiction on
previously managed forest areas; and local dude ranchers were against
improved roads, hotel construction and concessioner monopolies.
Proposals emerged to dam outlets of Jenny Lake and Emma Matilda and Two
Ocean Lakes in 1919.
Alarmed businessmen and ranchers felt that some form of protection by
the National Park Service might be their only salvation from
commercialization and natural resource destruction. Eventually, local
and
National Park Service interests merged at an historic meeting in Maud
Noble’s cabin on July 26, 1923. Participants included Yellowstone
Superintendent, Horace Albright; Bar BC dude ranchers, Struthers
Burt and Horace Carncross; newspaperman, Dick Winger; grocery
storeowner, Joe Jones; rancher, Jack Eynon; and ferry owner, Maud Noble.
They devised a strategy. Their plan sought to find private funds to
purchase private lands in Jackson Hole and create a recreation area or
reserve that would preserve the “Old West” character of the valley,
basically creating a “museum on the hoof." With the exception of Horace
Albright, the attendees did not support a national park, “because they
wanted traditional hunting, grazing, and dude-ranching activities to
continue.” In 1928, a Coordinating Commission on National Parks and
Forests met with residents of Jackson and reached consensus for park
approval. Local support and the Commission’s recommendations led Senator
John Kendrick of Wyoming to introduce a bill to establish Grand Teton
National Park. Senator Kendrick stated that once he viewed the Tetons he
“realized that some day they would become a park dedicated to the Nation
and posterity…” Congress passed Senator Kendrick’s bill. On February 26,
1929, President Calvin Coolidge signed this bill creating a 96,000-acre
park that included the Teton Range and six glacial lakes at the base of
the peaks. Since this fledgling 1929 park did not safeguard an entire
ecosystem, Albright and the other participants of the 1923 meeting
continued to pursue their dream of seeking private funds to purchase
private lands in Jackson Hole.
John
D. Rockefeller, Jr. became involved in the Jackson Hole Plan after a
visit to Teton country in 1924 and again in 1926. These visits
highlighted not only spectacular Teton scenery, but also shabby
developments littering the roadway from Menors Ferry to Moran and along
Jenny Lake’s south and east shores. Yellowstone Superintendent Albright
seized an opportunity to explain to Rockefeller the essence of the Noble
cabin meeting and the hope of protecting and preserving “this sublime
valley” from unsightly commercial development. Rockefeller decided to
purchase offending private properties with the intention of donating
these lands for National Park designation. He created the Snake River
Land Company as a purchasing agent to mask his association and keep land
prices affordable, since landowners would have undoubtedly inflated
their asking prices had they known of his involvement. The Snake River
Land Company launched an ambitious campaign to buy more than 35,000
acres for
approximately $1.4 million. What seemed like a simple and
straightforward plan became 20 years of bitter debate, nearly tearing
apart the Jackson Hole community. Intense hostility surrounded land
acquisitions; attempts by Rockefeller to gift these properties to the
National Park Service met resistance. Economic hardships suffered by
ranchers during the 1920’s helped ease some land acquisitions. Many
ranchers were actually relieved to sell and get out of business during a
time of economic difficulty. In 1925, ranchers circulated a petition in
support of the private buyout countering anti-park opinions in Jackson
Hole. Ninety-seven ranchers endorsed the petition’s statement, “that
this region will find its highest use as a playground…The destiny of
Jackson’s Hole is as a playground, typical of the west, for
the education and enjoyment of the Nation, as a whole." Perhaps this
quote has more credibility as a tacit admission that ranching in
northern Jackson Hole was difficult, if not impossible, than it has as a
genuine altruistic gesture by the ranchers. Because allegations were
made that the Snake River Land Company used illegal tactics during the
purchase of properties, a Senate Subcommittee convened hearings in 1933
to investigate. When the hearings concluded, it was clear that claims
about unfair business dealings by the Snake River Land Company and the
National Park Service were groundless and both were exonerated.
In 1934, Wyoming Senator Robert Carey introduced a bill in the Senate
once again to expand park boundaries. One compromise of this bill dealt
with reimbursement to Teton County for lost tax revenues. This bill and
another drafted in 1935 failed. The tax issue and objections to
including Jackson Lake because of dam and reservoir degradation fueled
anti-park sentiments anew. During 1937 and 1938, the National Park
Service prepared a document outlining the history of park extension and
defending the importance of park status upon tourism. Again, anti-park
sentiments flared and the expansion issue grew politically hotter. A
group of locals calling themselves the Jackson Hole Committee vehemently
opposed the park plan and encouraged the Wyoming delegation and Congress
to do so as well. The park dream remained bruised and battered as
controversy over enlargement continued into the 1940s. After purchasing
35,000 acres and holding the land for 15 years, John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
became
discouraged and impatient with the stalemate surrounding acceptance of
his gift. In an historic letter to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
he wrote that if the federal government did not want the gift of land or
could not “arrange to accept it on the general terms long discussed…it
will be my thought to make some other disposition of it or to sell it in
the market to any satisfactory buyers." This threat persuaded FDR to use
his presidential power to proclaim 221,000 acres as the Jackson Hole
National Monument on March 15, 1943. Robert Righter believes that
Rockefeller threatened to sell in order to provoke governmental action.
This bold action by Roosevelt provided a chance to circumvent obstacles
created by Congress and the Wyoming delegation. Local backlash
immediately followed as park opponents criticized the monument for being
a blatant violation of states’ rights. They also believed the monument
would destroy the local economy and county tax base. Hoping to force a
confrontation, armed and defiant ranchers trailed 500 cattle across
newly created monument land. The Park Service ignored this stunt but the
drive focused national attention on the monument. Controversy grew more
vocal and bitter, causing Wyoming Congressman Frank Barrett to introduce
a bill abolishing the Jackson Hole National Monument; it passed both
House and Senate.
President Roosevelt exercised a pocket veto, killing the bill. The
state of Wyoming responded to the veto by filing suit against the
National Park Service to overturn the proclamation. The suit failed in
the court system but the acrimonious local rift continued. The
proclamation directed transfer of acreage from the Teton National Forest
to the National Park Service. Since forest service administrators
opposed the monument, the transition between jurisdictions provoked
several vindictive deeds; one vengeful act involved gutting the Jackson
Lake Ranger Station before turning it over to park staff. Local park
supporters often faced hostilities and boycotts of their businesses
throughout these turbulent years. After World War II ended, the
sentiment began to change in Jackson Hole. Between 1945 and 1947, bills
were introduced in Congress to abolish the monument, but none passed.
Local citizens began to realize that tourism offered an economic future
for Jackson Hole. Eventually, attitudes became more agreeable toward
park enlargement. By April 1949, interested parties had gathered in the
Senate Appropriation Committee chambers to work out a final compromise.
Though it took decades of controversy and conflict, discord and strife,
the creation of a “new” Grand Teton National Park finally occurred on
September 14, 1950, when Harry S. Truman signed a bill merging the 1929
park with the 1943 monument to form an enlarged 310,000-acre park.
Preservation of the Teton Range, Jackson Lake, and much of Jackson Hole
was finally placed in the hands of the National Park Service as a more
complete ecosystem. Difficulties of park-making define Grand Teton
National Park and emphasize the visionary ideology of Horace Albright,
John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and several pro-park residents. Legislation for
the new park contained significant compromises: 1) protection of
existing grazing rights and stock driveways; 2) reimbursement to Teton
County for lost tax revenues; 3) provision for the controlled reduction
of elk within park boundaries; 4) agreement that in the future
presidential proclamation could not be used to create a national
monument in Wyoming; and 5) allowance for continuation of certain
existing uses and access rights to forest lands and inholder properties.
Congress enlarged the park to its present size in 1950, “…for the
purpose of including in one national park, for public benefit and
enjoyment, the lands within the present Grand Teton National Park and a
portion of the lands within Jackson Hole National Monument." The
conservation battle for Jackson Hole coupled with the philanthropic
dedication of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway shapes the
character of this valley to the present day. Imagine how different the
Teton landscape would look if unbridled development had prevailed over
preservation of natural resources. In celebrating the Fiftieth
Anniversary of Grand Teton National Park, we recognize and honor the
dedication, perseverance and aspirations of visionary men and women who
believed that the greatest good for the Teton countryside was as a
“public park or pleasure ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the
American people." As Crucible for Conservation author Robert Righter
suggests, what these visionaries achieved was “perhaps the most notable
conservation victory of the twentieth century.”
Written by Jackie Skaggs, 50th Anniversary Coordinator with research,
references and quotations taken from A Place Called Jackson Hole by John
Daugherty, Park Historian 1980-1991 and from Crucible For Conservation
by Robert Righter, currently research professor of history at Southern
Methodist University in Texas) January 2000. |